Ramesh Gulati, who is known as Reliability SHERPA, in his valuable
book "Maintenance and Reliability Best Practices" stated that: "For
decades, we have used a reward system that has created a misaligned
culture. Design teams are rewarded for achieving functional capability
at the lowest cost, not really concerned about the downstream problems
for operations and maintenance and the true life-cycle cost of ownership
of the asset. Production teams are rewarded when they beat a production
number, regardless of any real demand for the product and without any
concern for the effect their actions have on asset health. Maintenance
teams have typically been rewarded for fixing asset failures and not
improving reliability or availability. They get extra pay for coming in
at inconvenient times when the asset is broken and get “well done!” from
management when they fix it. If we are rewarded for failures, why would
we want reliability? Who would step up and volunteer for a 15-20% pay
cut for reduced overtime? People do not pay as much attention to what
their managers say compared to what they actually do. If management says
they want reliability — no failures or minimum failures — but they keep
paying for failures, we will continue to get failures. This culture
needs to be changed and improved."
I totally agree, as we often
praise and reward people who create or are responsible for problems in
the first place and then rush to solve them, rather than those who build
reliable, trusted systems that work flawlessly. From the perspective of
immature organizational culture, there is a lack of understanding and
evaluation. The one who acts as a firefighter is seen as hardworking and
always busy, while those who create an efficient system that results in
reducing problems and issues are often undervalued and overlooked. Immature
Organizations may think that the system works smoothly on its own and
that those who created and control it are useless. However, when those
individuals remove their hands, the system breaks down, leading to the
same fires that need fighting, and the cycle starts again.
Finally,
there is a tendency to reward reactive problem-solving rather than
proactive system-building. Many organizations prioritize and reward
immediate solutions over long-term strategies and plans, leading to a
cycle of recurring issues. By shifting our focus towards building robust
systems and recognizing the value of proactive thinking, we can create
more sustainable and efficient organizations.
Article by Amr H. Abayazeed - November 16, 2024.